8.4%
Lowest-represented role
Chief executives
Source: BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
12.8%
Average Latino share
across 10 occupations
vs. 20.0% U.S. Latino workforce share
100%
Occupations below the
20.0% workforce benchmark
10 of 10 occupations tracked
16.2%
Highest-represented role
Human resources workers
Source: BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Among chief executives of publicly traded companies, Latino representation (8.4%) is lower than in any occupation listed in government, education, or media. McKinsey's data shows top-quartile diverse companies outperform bottom-quartile by 36% on profitability.
All Occupations, Sorted by Latino Representation (lowest first)
Occupation Latino % · green line = 20.0% workforce benchmark Gap vs. benchmark Total employed Source
Chief executives
8.4%
-11.6pp 1,802K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Management analysts
9.6%
-10.4pp 1,084K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Project management specialists
10.0%
-10.0pp 1,150K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Marketing managers
11.5%
-8.5pp 669K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Human resources managers
13.3%
-6.7pp 314K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Sales managers
13.5%
-6.5pp 563K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
General and operations managers
14.1%
-5.9pp 1,379K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Human resources assistants, except payroll and timekeeping
15.5%
-4.5pp 124K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Purchasing managers
16.1%
-3.9pp 222K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg
Human resources workers
16.2%
-3.8pp 897K BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg

Benchmark: 20.0% = U.S. Latino share of civilian labor force (BLS CPS 2025 annual average). California benchmark: 40.3% (CA Latino population share, 2020 Census). The green vertical line in each bar marks the 20.0% national workforce benchmark.

Your part in Corporate / Management
Capital, hiring, and direction are set in some of the least representative rooms in American life. Your part: be counted, take the seat you have earned, and open the next one.
See your field's number and be counted →
See how this connects to the full story, across all industries, over time.
See the full data story →

Data & Methodology

These tables are the BLS Current Population Survey, in which people report their own occupation. Elsewhere on this site we cite the profession registries (AAMC for physicians, ABA for attorneys, LCDA for board seats), which count licensed members of a profession. The two disagree, and we show both rather than pick the flattering one: the CPS puts Latino lawyers at 9.2%, while the ABA, counting licensed attorneys, puts them at 6.0%. Where the two differ, the figure we stand behind and cite is the registry.

The parity line is 20.0%, the Latino share of everyone employed in America (BLS CPS 2025, Table 11). Occupations employing fewer than 150,000 people carry wide sampling error and are never used as a headline figure here.

Occupation data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey (CPS) Table 11, 2025 annual average. "Latino" = "Hispanic or Latino" per BLS CPS coding. All figures are annual averages of monthly survey estimates; small occupations (<50,000 workers) have higher margin of error.

Silicon Valley Technology figures sourced from cirlabs / Reveal News EEO-1 analysis of large tech employers, 2016 (most recent public EEO-1 release with race × job category × company detail). Internal job classifications differ from BLS CPS categories.

Gap = Latino % − 20.0% U.S. Latino workforce benchmark (BLS CPS 2025). Negative gap = underrepresented relative to workforce share. All data public domain. Script and source: github.com/turnerll/ligazon.