Lawyers at 9.2%. Judges at 13.1%. The institutions that interpret and enforce the rules governing Latino communities are, at the professional level, staffed by people who did not come from those communities. In immigration court, criminal defense, and civil rights litigation, this gap has documented consequences for outcomes.
| Occupation | Latino % · green line = 18.7% workforce benchmark | Gap vs. benchmark | Total employed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawyers | 9.2% | -9.5pp | 1,146K | BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg |
| Judges, magistrates, and other judicial workers | 13.1% | -5.6pp | 57K | BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg |
| Court, municipal, and license clerks | 17.5% | -1.2pp | 64K | BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg |
| Legal support workers, all other | 18.9% | +0.2pp | 79K | BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg |
| Paralegals and legal assistants | 20.4% | +1.7pp | 486K | BLS CPS Table 11, 2025 annual avg |
Benchmark: 18.7% = U.S. Latino share of civilian labor force (BLS CPS 2025 annual average). California benchmark: 40.3% (CA Latino population share, 2020 Census). The green vertical line in each bar marks the 18.7% national workforce benchmark.
Data & Methodology
Occupation data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey (CPS) Table 11, 2025 annual average. "Latino" = "Hispanic or Latino" per BLS CPS coding. All figures are annual averages of monthly survey estimates; small occupations (<50,000 workers) have higher margin of error.
Silicon Valley Technology figures sourced from cirlabs / Reveal News EEO-1 analysis of large tech employers, 2016 (most recent public EEO-1 release with race × job category × company detail). Internal job classifications differ from BLS CPS categories.
Gap = Latino % − 18.7% U.S. Latino workforce benchmark (BLS CPS 2025). Negative gap = underrepresented relative to workforce share. All data public domain. Script and source: github.com/turnerll/ligazon.